- 11 - petitioner’s overpayment for 2001.10 The disallowance of the credit that petitioner claimed with respect to this item does not affect the amount of petitioner’s deficiency for 2002. See sec. 6211(a) (defining a deficiency generally as the amount by which the correct tax exceeds the tax shown on the taxpayer’s return, increased by prior assessments and reduced by rebates as defined in sec. 6211(b)(2)); cf. Terry v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 85 (1988) (holding that an intercepted refund does not constitute a rebate for purposes of determining a deficiency). We have considered all of petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. To reflect the foregoing and the parties’ concessions, Decision will be entered under Rule 155. 10 As of April 26, 2002, it could not have been determined whether petitioner had any overpayment with respect to taxable year 2002.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: May 25, 2011