- 4 -
Settlement Officer Timothy J. Sample (Mr. Sample), who was able
to conduct the hearing at petitioner’s desired location.5
On June 16, 2005, Mr. Sample sent a letter to petitioner
confirming a face-to-face hearing for June 27, 2005. On June 27,
2005, Mr. Sample telephoned petitioner and postponed the
conference because he needed to issue to petitioner a contact
letter setting forth the issues to be discussed at the conference
and requesting the financial information necessary to conduct the
hearing. Mr. Sample informed petitioner that petitioner would be
denied a face-to-face hearing if petitioner did not raise any
substantive issues in response to these requests. On June 27,
2005, Mr. Sample sent a letter to petitioner scheduling a
telephone conference for July 13, 2005.
On July 8, 2005, Mr. Sample received a letter from
petitioner in which no substantive issues were raised and no
financial information was provided. On July 13, 2005, Mr. Sample
attempted to contact petitioner to conduct the scheduled
telephone conference, but petitioner did not participate. On
July 14, 2005, Mr. Sample sent petitioner a letter scheduling a
telephone conference for July 25, 2005.
On July 15, 2005, Mr. Sample received from petitioner a
package of documents consisting of frivolous arguments and a
5 Mr. Sample works in the Glendale, Cal., office, but he
occasionally works in the Thousand Oaks office and was willing to
meet with petitioner at the Thousand Oaks office.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011