Robert B. Keenan - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          booklet entitled “Investigating the Federal Income Tax” but no              
          financial information.  On July 22, 2005, Mr. Sample received a             
          letter from petitioner claiming that he did not participate in              
          the July 13, 2005, telephone conference because he did not                  
          receive the June 27, 2005, letter.  In a second letter to Mr.               
          Sample, petitioner stated that he wished to discuss collection              
          alternatives at a face-to-face hearing.                                     
               Because petitioner stated that he wanted to discuss                    
          collection alternatives, Mr. Sample elected to grant petitioner a           
          face-to-face hearing.  Before the hearing, Mr. Sample again                 
          informed petitioner that he was required to submit income tax               
          returns and financial statements in order to discuss collection             
          alternatives.  On August 22, 2005, Mr. Sample received a letter             
          from petitioner containing constitutional arguments but no                  
          financial information.                                                      
               On September 9, 2005, petitioner’s section 6330 hearing took           
          place.  Petitioner failed to provide any tax returns or financial           
          information, thus preventing the discussion of possible                     
          collection alternatives.  When petitioner insisted on discussing            
          frivolous arguments concerning his underlying tax liability, Mr.            
          Sample adjourned the meeting.                                               
               On October 4, 2005, respondent issued a Notice of                      
          Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320            
          and/or 6330, which sustained the proposed levy action.  In the              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011