Michael W. Keller - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          $21,043 for 1991, 1992, and 1993, respectively.  Respondent                 
          issued refunds in those amounts on February 5, 1996.                        
               Petitioner filed his 1995 Federal income tax return on                 
          August 5, 1996.  On an attached Schedule F, petitioner reported             
          the following:                                                              
               Farm income, sales of livestock         $80,928                        
               Depreciation                            (83,351)                       
               Interest expense                        (24,600)                       
               “1994 Sharecropboard exp”               (80,928)                       
               Net farm profit or (loss)          (107,951)                           
          With respect to the depreciation deduction, petitioner attached a           
          depreciation schedule reporting a cost basis in his “registured             
          [sic] cattle” of $625,100.  Petitioner subtracted his net farm              
          loss of $107,951 from wage, interest, and capital gains income              
          totaling $132,527 for total income of $24,576.  After subtracting           
          other deductions, petitioner reported zero taxable income and               
          zero taxes due.  Petitioner reported taxes withheld of $8,788 and           
          requested a refund of that amount.  Respondent did not issue a              
          refund for 1995.                                                            
          D.   Respondent’s Review of Petitioner’s Tax Claims                         
               On January 10, 1996, nearly 7 months before petitioner filed           
          his 1995 return, respondent sent petitioner a prefiling notice.             
          The prefiling notice informed petitioner that he had been                   
          identified as an investor in a tax shelter promoted by Hoyt.  It            
          further informed petitioner that deductions relating to the tax             
          shelter would not be allowed and that claiming such deductions              






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011