Helen M. Korchak - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          rental losses (viz., a claimed rental loss of $7,627 with respect           
          to property located on Hilton Head Island and a claimed rental              
          loss of $22,383 with respect to a property identified as “Evian”)           
          and windfall profit tax withheld in 1982 of $720.                           
               Schedule E had the following notation with respect to the              
          claimed partnership losses of $189,965:  “SEE STATEMENT 2".                 
          Statement 2 showed, inter alia, the following partnerships and              
          the following claimed loss of each such partnership that gave               
          rise to the total claimed partnership losses of $189,965 shown in           
          Schedule E:                                                                 
                     Name of Partnership                Partnership Loss              
          Kelly-Brock Drilling Partners 1981-11             $64,753                   
          Odessey Partners 81 Limited Partnership1         57,087                     
          Matagorda Limited Partnership II1                 10,036                    
          Madison Recycling                                58,089                     
               1Petitioner and Mr. Korchak also claimed losses with respect           
          to Mr. Korchak’s three oil and gas partnerships for their taxable           
          year 1981.                                                                  
          There was nothing about the claimed $58,089 Madison Recycling               
          loss that would have made that claimed loss stand out in rela-              
          tionship to the other partnership losses claimed in the 1982                
          joint tax return.                                                           
               Statement 2 also showed for each of the partnerships identi-           
          fied below the following amount as “PROPERTY QUALIFIED FOR                  
          INVESTMENT CREDIT NEW RECOVERY PROPERTY - OTHER”:                           








Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011