Helen M. Korchak - Page 36

                                        - 36 -                                        

               12a. Was your (ex)spouse aware of any financial                        
                    problems you were having such as bankruptcy, high                 
                    credit card debt or difficulty paying monthly                     
                    living expenses?  If yes, please explain.                         
                    I did not have any financial problems at the time.                
               13. If the tax years in question were audited, what                    
                    items, if any, changed?  Were the changed items                   
                    yours or your (ex)spouse’s?  (For example,                        
                    unreported income, disallowed deductions,                         
                    unclaimed credits)                                                
                    The audit of my LTD. partnership [Madison                         
                    Recycling] disallowed my deduction and tax                        
                    credits.  This was solely my investment.                          
                  *       *       *       *       *       *       *                   
               15. If the items changed by the audit were yours, did                  
                    your (ex)spouse benefit from them?  Explain.                      
                    No:  The losses and tax credits resulted in a                     
                    refund of my withholdings.  The refund was                        
                    invested in another business venture of mine which                
                    failed in 1990.  [Reproduced literally.]                          
               On December 15, 2004, respondent received a memorandum from            
          petitioner’s attorney of record herein (petitioner’s December 15,           
          2004 memorandum).  Petitioner’s December 15, 2004 memorandum set            
          forth (1) factual contentions that are substantially the same as            
          those set forth in petitioner’s attachment to petitioner’s Form             
          12507 and (2) legal arguments that are substantially the same as            
          those set forth in the posttrial briefs that petitioner filed               
          herein.  Petitioner’s December 15, 2004 memorandum also stated in           
          pertinent part:                                                             
                    In 1982, unknown to Helen Korchak [petitioner],                   
               her husband Ernest [Mr. Korchak] invested in various                   





Page:  Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011