Helen M. Korchak - Page 37

                                        - 37 -                                        
               partnerships and claimed a Schedule E loss in the                      
               amount of $220,695.00 on their Form 1040 joint income                  
               tax return.  Mr. and Mrs. Korchak’s Form 1040 for 1982,                
               together with schedules, consists of 36 pages!  There                  
               were also losses and investment credits for Schedule C                 
               activity for rental of buses that generated a loss                     
               deduction of $24,961.00, and net short-term and long-                  
               term loss deductions for U.S. Treasury Bills.  The                     
               Schedule E deductions consisted of a $64,753.00 loss                   
               from Kelly-Brock Drilling Partners, a $57,087.00 part-                 
               nership loss from Odyssey Partners, a $10,036.00 part-                 
               nership loss from Matagorda Ltd., a $58,089.00 partner-                
               ship loss from Madison Recycling Associates, and a                     
               $30,010.00 loss from two rental properties.  From all                  
               those various, sophisticated investments, the Internal                 
               Revenue Service disallowed only the loss deduction from                
               Madison Recycling Associates, which resulted in the                    
               deficiency at issue.                                                   
                    In 1988, Ernest showed Helen a February 16, 1988                  
               Notice from the Internal Revenue Service disallowing                   
               the Madison Recycling Associates loss claimed on their                 
               1982 income tax return.  Until then, Helen had no                      
               awareness or knowledge of Ernest’s various investments.                
               Helen’s only knowledge about the 1982 income tax return                
               was to provide Ernest with a copy of her W-2 reporting                 
               wages in the amount of $15,339.00.   As of today, the                  
               disallowed Madison Recycling Associates loss and tax                   
               credits, with interest and penalties, result in an                     
               asserted deficiency exceeding two and one half million                 
               dollars ($2,500,000).   The potential tax liability                    
               exceeds the net value of the Korchak’s assets.  At age                 
               67, Helen could be faced with Internal Revenue Service                 
               collection activity that could levy upon her entire                    
               pension benefits and her home - a terrible hardship for                
               reporting her $15,339.00 wages on a joint income tax                   
               return. * * *                                                          
                  *       *       *       *       *       *       *                   
               •    Her husband purchased interests in various part-                  
                    nerships and only the loss deduction from one                     
                    investment, Madison Recycling Associates, was                     
                    disallowed                                                        
               •    Funds for the purchase came from her husband’s                    
                    income                                                            






Page:  Previous  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011