Kai-Chung C. and Meekhing T. Lam - Page 13

                                        -13-                                          
          amount of such expense or other item, the time and place of the             
          expense, the business purpose of the expense, and the business              
          relationship to the taxpayer of the person entertained.  See sec.           
          274(d); sec. 1.274-5T, Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg.             
          46014 (Nov. 6, 1985).  We may not estimate expenses subject to              
          the strict substantiation requirements.  Sanford v. Commissioner,           
          50 T.C. 823, 827 (1968), affd. per curiam 412 F.2d 201 (2d Cir.             
          1969).                                                                      
               Petitioner contests respondent’s disallowance of car and               
          truck, travel, and meals and entertainment expenses.  Petitioners           
          offered no testimony as to what car and truck, travel, and meals            
          and entertainment expenses were incurred and introduced no                  
          documentation.  We conclude that petitioners have failed to                 
          substantiate any of the expenses subject to the strict                      
          substantiation requirements of section 274(d) and therefore are             
          not entitled to any deduction beyond what respondent previously             
          allowed.                                                                    
          III. Unreported Rental Income                                               
               We now address whether petitioners failed to report $3,424             
          of rental income in 1996 as respondent determined.  Petitioners             
          did not introduce any evidence at trial regarding respondent’s              
          determination of the unreported rental income and did not address           
          this determination in their brief.  We conclude that petitioners            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011