Rick D. Lamb and Susan L. Story - Page 7

                                        - 6 -                                         
          of $500, expenses of $43,735, and a net loss of $44,235.4  No               
          legal or consultation fees were reported as income.                         
               The following expenses were claimed as Schedule C deductions           
          on the 1999 and 2000 income tax returns:                                    













               4The negative gross income of $500 on Schedule C, Profit or            
          Loss From Business, for 2000 resulted from the reporting of                 
          $1,200 in gross receipts and cost of goods sold of $1,700,                  
          resulting in negative gross income of $500.  Part III, Cost of              
          Goods Sold, of Schedule C for that year listed a beginning                  
          inventory of $10,200, an ending inventory of $8,500, and cost of            
          goods sold of $1,700, thus the $500 in negative gross income                
          reported on Part I of the return.  Petitioner was questioned at             
          trial as to how, as a consultant, he incurred “cost of goods                
          sold”, since he was an attorney and a doctor and was not in the             
          business of buying and selling merchandise.  The revenue agent’s            
          report makes the same observation:  “I do not understand why an             
          attorney would have cost of goods sold * * * attorneys sell a               
          service, they do not manufacture, nor purchase and resell a                 
          product.”  Petitioner’s explanation at trial was that he owned a            
          computer that had originally cost $1,700, and it was sold during            
          2000 for $1,200.  The revenue agent disallowed the $1,700                   
          adjustment for cost of goods sold.  Petitioner conceded the issue           
          at trial.  Because the transaction involved the sale of an asset,           
          it should have been reported on Schedule D, Capital Gains and               
          Losses.  It follows that the $1,200 reported as gross receipts on           
          the Schedule C for tax year 2000 was not in fact gross receipts             
          from petitioner’s claimed business activity as a doctor/lawyer              
          consultant; therefore, petitioner realized no gross income from             
          his activity for either 1999 or 2000.                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011