Rick D. Lamb and Susan L. Story - Page 12

                                       - 11 -                                         
          do not evidence business engagement.  Indus. Research Prods.,               
          Inc. v. Commissioner, 40 T.C. 578 (1963).  In Evan v.                       
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-180, the Court disallowed                     
          deductions claimed for Schedule C business expenses where the               
          only income realized was from an employment relationship and not            
          from a Schedule C trade or business.                                        
               The Court rejects petitioner’s argument that his salary from           
          the V.A. should be aggregated or attributed to his Schedule C               
          activities as a counterargument to respondent’s determination               
          that, because there was no trade or business income, the expenses           
          related thereto are not deductible.  Petitioners cited no                   
          authority to support this argument.  Petitioner was an employee             
          of the V.A., and, as such, his wages or salary were subject to a            
          treatment different from income from or losses from a self-                 
          employed trade or business activity.  As an employee with the               
          V.A., he was issued Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, which                
          reflected deductions for Social Security taxes and other                    
          deductions that would not be applicable in a self-employed                  
          activity.  The Court, therefore, rejects that argument.  An                 
          employer-employee relationship is not a self-employment activity.           
               The Court finally considers whether petitioners are entitled           
          to deductions for job search expenses.  Such expenses were                  
          claimed by petitioner as Schedule C trade or business expenses.             
          However, it is obvious, as noted earlier, that, if petitioner was           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011