Leatherstocking 1983 Partnership, Sam I. Brown, A Partner Other Than The Tax Matters Partner - Page 2

                                         -2-                                          
          Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), Pub. L.               
          97-248, sec. 401, 96 Stat. 648.  Sam I. Brown, a partner other              
          than the tax matters partner of Leatherstocking 1983 Partnership            
          (Leatherstocking), petitioned the Court to readjust partnership             
          items respondent adjusted for 1983 and 1984.  Respondent                    
          determined that Leatherstocking could not deduct $950,907 and               
          $569,940 of expenses for the respective years because it failed             
          to establish that its activities were entered into for profit or            
          for the production of income, or that the “alleged transaction”             
          had economic substance or reality.  Petitioner alleged in the               
          petition that respondent erred in his determination because                 
          Leatherstocking’s activities were entered into for profit and for           
          the production of income, and the “alleged transaction” did have            
          economic substance and reality.                                             
               On November 2, 1998, petitioner moved the Court for leave to           
          amend the petition to allege that respondent had issued the                 
          underlying notices of final partnership administrative adjustment           
          (FPAAs) after the periods of limitation had expired.  The motion            
          noted that the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit had                  
          recently decided Transpac Drilling Venture 1982-12 v.                       
          Commissioner, 147 F.3d 221 (2d Cir. 1998), revg. and remanding              
          T.C. Memo. 1994-26, and stated that the court in that case had              
          “found on substantially similar facts as the instant case that,             
          as a result of being placed under investigation by the Internal             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011