-3- Revenue Service, the tax matters partners of various partnerships labored under a conflict of interest and, thereby, were disqualified from binding the partnerships by extending the assessment period.” The motion stated further that Leatherstocking’s tax matters partner (TMP), Robert L. Steele (Steele), had been under investigation by the Commissioner’s Criminal Investigation Division (CID). This Court allowed petitioner to amend the petition on November 4, 1998, to challenge the timeliness of the FPAAs. When the case was called for trial, petitioner conceded all allegations of error initially set forth in the petition and stated that he was henceforth relying solely on the allegation that the FPAAs were issued untimely. We decide whether the periods of limitation for assessment as to Leatherstocking’s limited partners remain open for the subject years. We hold they do. Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the applicable versions of the Internal Revenue Code. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Preface Some facts were stipulated. We incorporate herein by this reference the parties’ stipulations of facts and the exhibits submitted therewith. We find the stipulated facts accordingly.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011