William M. Leggett - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          arbitrarily, capriciously, or without sound basis in fact or                
          law.”  Woodral v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 19, 23 (1999).                     
               Petitioner frivolously alleges without any evidentiary                 
          support that respondent did not comply with the notice                      
          requirements of section 6303.  Section 6303(a) provides that “the           
          Secretary shall, as soon as practicable, and within 60 days,                
          after the making of an assessment of a tax pursuant to section              
          6203, give notice to each person liable for the unpaid tax,                 
          stating the amount and demanding payment thereof.”  If the notice           
          is mailed, it shall be sent to the taxpayer’s last known address.           
          Sec. 6303(a).  A notice of balance due constitutes a notice and             
          demand for payment for purposes of section 6303(a).  Craig v.               
          Commissioner, 119 T.C. 252, 262-263 (2002).  The record reflects            
          that respondent sent petitioner a notice of balance due for the             
          years in issue on May 12, 2003.                                             
               Petitioner alleges broadly that respondent did not comply              
          with sections 6321 and/or 6331.  Section 6321 is not relevant to            
          petitioner’s case as it pertains to liens.  Section 6331 governs            
          levy actions and thus is applicable.  The record reflects that              
          respondent complied with section 6331 as respondent provided                
          petitioner with the requisite notice, a Final Notice - Notice of            
          Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing, on March 1,           
          2004, which petitioner apparently received, as he requested a               
          collection hearing.                                                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011