William M. Leggett - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
               Petitioner also contends that respondent’s assessments are             
          invalid.  Petitioner did not show, or even allege, that there was           
          any irregularity in the assessment procedure that would raise a             
          question about the validity of the assessments.  Respondent noted           
          verification in the notice of determination that all requirements           
          of applicable law and administrative procedure had been met and             
          that respondent had properly balanced the need for efficient                
          collection against any legitimate concerns of intrusiveness                 
          raised by petitioner.  Petitioner has not presented any evidence            
          or persuasive arguments that respondent erred or abused his                 
          discretion but instead has raised frivolous and groundless                  
          arguments.  Hence, the Court concludes that respondent’s                    
          determination to proceed with collection of petitioner’s tax                
          liabilities was not in error or an abuse of discretion, and                 
          respondent may proceed with the proposed collection.                        
          II. Section 6673 Penalty                                                    
               Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes the Tax Court to impose a                
          penalty not in excess of $25,000 on a taxpayer for proceedings              
          instituted primarily for delay or in which the taxpayer’s                   
          position is frivolous or groundless.  “A petition to the Tax                
          Court, or a tax return, is frivolous if it is contrary to                   
          established law and unsupported by a reasoned, colorable argument           
          for change in the law.”  Coleman v. Commissioner, 791 F.2d 68, 71           
          (7th Cir. 1986).                                                            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011