William M. Leggett - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
                       MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION                        

               WHERRY, Judge:  Respondent determined a Federal income tax             
          deficiency for petitioner’s 2002 taxable year in the amount of              
          $8,716, and additions to tax pursuant to sections 6651(a)(1) and            
          6654(a) of $2,614.80 and $291.26, respectively.1  The issues for            
          decision are:  (1) Whether petitioner is liable for a deficiency            
          and additions to tax on unreported income for the 2002 taxable              
          year; and (2) whether the Court should impose a penalty under               
          section 6673.                                                               
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been deemed stipulated pursuant to              
          Rule 91(f), and additional facts have been stipulated by the                
          parties.2  The stipulations, with accompanying exhibits, are                

               1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to             
          the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the year in issue,           
          and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice              
          and Procedure.                                                              
               2The Court found petitioner’s objection to the proposed                
          stipulation of facts, based primarily on Fifth Amendment                    
          assertions, to be meritless.  Respondent assured petitioner and             
          the Court that “To the best of respondent’s knowledge, petitioner           
          has not currently, nor has he ever been, the subject of any                 
          criminal tax or other criminal investigation by respondent, that            
          no criminal tax or other criminal investigation of petitioner is            
          contemplated or anticipated by respondent, and that there are no            
          indications that respondent ever even considered the imposition             
          of civil fraud penalties in petitioner’s several cases.”  The               
          Fifth Amendment “protects against real dangers, not remote and              
          speculative possibilities.”  Zicarelli v. N.J. State Commn. of              
          Investigation, 406 U.S. 472, 478 (1972).  Furthermore, “In a                
          civil tax case, the taxpayer must accept the consequences of                
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011