William M. Leggett - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          incorporated herein by this reference.  At the time the petition            
          was filed, petitioner resided in Sorrento, Florida.                         
               Petitioner failed to file a Federal income tax return for              
          his 2002 taxable year.  During 2002, petitioner was self-employed           
          and installed residential and commercial heating and air-                   
          conditioning units.  Petitioner received compensation from                  
          Maronda Homes, Inc. and Victoria Investment Properties, Inc. in             
          the amounts of $4,585 and $22,247, respectively.  Petitioner also           
          received $14,544 in Social Security benefits.  During 2002,                 
          petitioner was married to Martha Leggett.                                   
               Respondent issued to petitioner a notice of deficiency on              
          October 5, 2004, for the above-mentioned deficiency and additions           
          to tax.3  Petitioner filed a timely petition disputing the                  
          deficiency and additions to tax.  Petitioner argued at trial and            
          in documents submitted to the Court that he “does not and has not           
          engaged in an activity that produces ‘TAXABLE INCOME’, but only             


               2(...continued)                                                        
          asserting the Fifth Amendment and cannot avoid the burden of                
          proof by claiming the privilege and attempting to convert ‘the              
          shield * * * which it was intended to be into a sword’.”  Lee v.            
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-95 (citing United States v.                   
          Rylander, 460 U.S. 752, 758 (1983)), affd. 61 Fed. Appx. 471 (9th           
          Cir. 2003); see also Stang v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-154,            
          affd.     Fed. Appx.     (9th Cir., Sept. 15, 2006).                        
               3The parties filed posttrial a supplemental stipulation of             
          facts which stipulated that petitioner had additional income of             
          $7,601.48 and was entitled to deduct expenses of $5,944.47.                 
          Respondent conceded that the deficiency and additions to tax                
          determined in the notice of deficiency would remain unaffected.             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011