William Lenihan - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          occurred, which increased the deficiency for that year.  See Rule           
          142(a).  While we recognized that the Commissioner had failed to            
          carry his burden of proving that the couple had realized any gain           
          on the sale of the paintings, we treated the taxpayers’ assertion           
          that their joint basis was $100,000 as an admission that their              
          joint basis was no greater than that, and we found that the                 
          husband had realized a gain to the extent that his share of the             
          $250,000 of proceeds exceeded his share of the admitted $100,000            
          basis.                                                                      
               We shall likewise accept petitioner’s Schedule D entries as            
          admissions that his bases in his interests in Oxford and Kemper             
          did not exceed $2,962 and $1,288, respectively, and that he                 
          realized gains on the sales of those two assets of at least $444            
          and $219, respectively.  Moreover, because of petitioner’s                  
          superior position with respect to access to information as to his           
          bases in those assets, we place on him the burden of coming                 
          forward with evidence showing a basis greater than zero in either           
          asset.  We are free to do so because we have not invariably held            
          that, when the burden is on the Commissioner to prove that the              
          taxpayer underreported his income from sales, the Commissioner              
          must come forward with evidence showing both unreported receipts            
          and the absence of offsetting costs or deductions above those               
          allowed by the Commissioner.  For example, in Franklin v.                   
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-184, we sustained an addition to              






Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011