Harry Lewis - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner’s 2002 and            
          2003 Federal income taxes of $8,501 and $10,356, respectively,              
          and accuracy-related penalties under section 6662(a) of $1,700.20           
          and $2,071.20, respectively.  After concessions by respondent,2             
          the issues for decision are:  (1) Whether petitioner is entitled            
          to claimed itemized deductions for charitable contributions of              
          $16,500 for 2002 and $20,000 for 2003 and (2) whether petitioner            
          is liable for accuracy-related penalties pursuant to section                
          6662(a) as determined by respondent.                                        
               Some facts have been stipulated and are so found.  The                 
          stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated             
          by this reference.  When the petition was filed, petitioner                 
          resided in Downingtown, Pennsylvania.  Petitioner has a master’s            
          degree from Penn State University and is a high school principal.           
               Petitioner timely filed 2002 and 2003 electronic Federal               
          income tax returns.  Petitioner’s tax returns for the years in              
          issue were prepared by Mr. Chester Muhammad.  On these returns,             
          petitioner claimed charitable contribution deductions of $16,500            
          for 2002 and $20,000 for 2003.                                              



               2 Petitioner filed his returns as a head of household and              
          claimed a dependency exemption deduction for his daughter.                  
          Respondent’s notice of deficiency changed petitioner’s filing               
          status to single and disallowed the dependency exemptions for               
          both 2002 and 2003.  The parties have since stipulated that                 
          petitioner is entitled to head of household filing status and the           
          dependency exemptions for both years.                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011