Harry Lewis - Page 6

                                        - 5 -                                         
          including:  (1) Whether the writing that evidences the                      
          contribution was written contemporaneously and (2) whether the              
          taxpayer keeps regular records of the contributions.                        
               Any charitable contribution of more than $250 must further             
          be substantiated by “a contemporaneous written acknowledgment of            
          the contribution by the donee organization”.  Sec. 170(f)(8).               
          “Separate contributions of less than $250 are not subject to the            
          requirements of section 170(f)(8), regardless of whether the sum            
          of the contributions made by a taxpayer to a donee organization             
          during a taxable year equals $250 or more.”  Sec. 1.170A-                   
          13(f)(1), Income Tax Regs.                                                  
               Petitioner contends that he gave cash on a regular basis to            
          the church.  Petitioner testified that his brother is the pastor            
          of the church and that he, petitioner, is not a churchgoer.                 
          Petitioner testified that he was given a receipt from his                   
          brother’s church for his contributions, but he did not produce              
          the receipt at trial.  Petitioner kept no contemporaneous records           
          of his claimed contributions.  Only after receiving notification            
          of an examination of his 2002 and 2003 returns did petitioner               
          prepare written lists of cash contributions given to the church.            
          Petitioner admitted that the lists were not accurate and that he            
          essentially “divvied up” the sum of his contributions into equal            
          parts for each week of each year.  Additionally, the deductions             
          claimed on petitioner’s 2002 and 2003 returns differ greatly                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011