Larry J. and Anita L. Lundgren - Page 19

                                        - 19 -                                        
               Although it is highly probable that the Treasury note had a            
          material tax basis, petitioners did not provide any evidence or             
          documentation regarding the basis of the Treasury note.7                    
          Petitioners’ contention that the income is that of Lucky Kirt               
          Trust is unavailing because the Lucky Kirt Trust is disregarded             
          for Federal income tax purposes.  The Court, therefore, sustains            
          respondent on this issue.                                                   
          VI. Section 6662 Penalty                                                    
               With respect to examinations beginning after July 22, 1998,            
          the Commissioner bears the burden of production in any court                
          proceeding involving an individual’s liability for penalties or             
          additions to tax.  Sec. 7491(c).  To meet this burden, the                  
          Commissioner must come forward with sufficient evidence                     
          indicating that it is appropriate to impose the relevant penalty            
          or addition to tax.  Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 446              
          (2001).  In instances where an exception to the penalty or                  
          addition to tax is afforded upon a showing of reasonable cause,             
          the taxpayer bears the burden of showing such cause.  Id. at 447.           
               Section 6662(a) provides for an accuracy-related penalty in            
          the amount of 20 percent of the portion of an underpayment                  
          attributable to (among other things):  (1) Any negligence or                




               7 The Court highlighted this issue at the start of the trial           
          by suggesting to petitioners that the Court should hear any                 
          evidence pertaining to the amount they paid for the note or any             
          other evidence that could be relevant to their tax liability.               



Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011