John V. Maher - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          promises, all through use of the mails, in violation of 18 U.S.C.           
          section 1341.                                                               
          Petitioner’s Federal Tax Returns                                            
          For taxable years 1995 and 1996, petitioner timely filed                    
          self-prepared Forms 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return.                
          Petitioner reported gross income of $61,725 and $61,406 on his              
          1995 and 1996 tax returns, respectively.  He reported none of the           
          payments he had received from the Kieffers.                                 
          Notice of Deficiency                                                        
               On April 9, 2003, respondent mailed to petitioner a notice             
          of deficiency for 1995 and 1996, determining that petitioner had            
          unreported income of $9,500 for 1995 and $65,000 for 1996 and was           
          liable for the civil fraud penalty for both years.3                         
                                       OPINION                                        
               At trial, petitioner conceded that he had unreported taxable           
          income with respect to the Kieffers’ cash payments to him in 1995           
          and 1996.4  Consequently, the primary issue remaining for                   
          decision is whether petitioner is liable for the section 6663(a)            
          civil fraud penalty.                                                        


               3 In the notice of deficiency, respondent also disallowed              
          itemized deductions that petitioner had claimed for unreimbursed            
          employee expenses.  Before trial, the parties settled this issue,           
          agreeing that petitioner had substantiated stipulated amounts of            
          expenses, which for 1995 exceeded the expenses claimed on his               
          return.                                                                     
               4 Similarly, the parties have stipulated that the Kieffers’            
          payments to petitioner were “income” to him.                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011