- 9 - allowances to those items. Ms. Cochran increased the tax expense to reflect the increased amount of determined income. As adjusted, the following were the determined monthly items of expenses: Total Living Expenses Amount Food, clothing, and miscellaneous $1,271 Housing and utilities 1,603 Transportation 471 Health care 1,747 Taxes (income) 2,000 Life insurance 28 Other expenses (attorney’s fees) 728 Total 7,848 Ms. Cochran determined that petitioner’s monthly excess income (i.e., monthly income less monthly expenses) was $3,164 ($11,012 - $7,848), his income potential for the next 116 months was approximately $367,024 ($3,164 x 116 months = $367,024),10 and the reasonable collection potential was $663,914 (income potential of $367,024 + net realizable equity of $296,890). On December 16, 2004, respondent issued petitioner a notice of determination sustaining the proposed levy with the provision that the collection activity will not include the collection of interest or penalties until the interest and penalty cases were 10 In the notice, Ms. Cochran mistakenly used a 116-month factor to determine petitioner’s income potential. On brief, respondent corrected the mistake by using a 48-month factor as required when a taxpayer makes a cash offer. As a result, petitioner’s correct income potential was $151,872 ($3,164 x 48 = $151,872). See Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) sec. 5.8.5.5.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011