Medical Transportation Management Corporation - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          may qualify as an automobile bus under section 6421 is an issue             
          of first impression.  The term “bus” for purposes of section 6421           
          is not defined in the Code, the applicable regulations, or the              
          legislative history.  The legislative history suggests that                 
          Congress intended to limit the scope of section 6421 to buses.              
          Section 6421 was added to the Code by section 208(c) of the                 
          Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, Pub. L. 84-627, 70 Stat. 394.              
          As enacted, section 6421(b)(1) originally provided for a payment            
          of excise tax “If gasoline is used * * * in vehicles while                  
          engaged in furnishing scheduled common carrier public passenger             
          land transportation service along regular routes”.  The                     
          applicable version of section 6421(b) was amended by section                
          233(a) of the Energy Tax of 1978, Pub. L. 95-618, 92 Stat. 3190             
          (1978 amendment).  The word “vehicles” was replaced with                    
          “automobile buses”.  The Senate report explains that “Since bus             
          transportation is more energy-efficient than private automobile             
          transportation, the committee believes it desirable to encourage            
          greater use of bus transportation.”  S. Rept. 95-529, at 54                 
          (1977), 1978-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) 199, 246.  Although Congress made              
          clear its intent to limit the application of the statute to                 
          buses, it never defined the word “bus”.  We therefore assume that           
          Congress intended the word “bus” to carry its “‘ordinary,                   
          contemporary, common meaning.’”  Pioneer Inv. Servs. Co. v.                 
          Brunswick Associates Ltd. Pship., 507 U.S. 380, 388                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011