Deborah A. Messina - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          State of Maryland paid to petitioner, wages totaling $6,227 that            
          Sportland Properties paid to her, and interest totaling $140 that           
          Ocean City Bank paid to her.  In the notice, respondent also                
          determined that petitioner is liable for 1994 for additions to              
          tax under, inter alia, sections 6651(a)(1) and 6654(a), respec-             
          tively.4                                                                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               Petitioner bears the burden of proving that the determina-             
          tions in the notice are erroneous.5  Rule 142(a); Welch v.                  
          Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).                                        
          $170,000 Settlement                                                         
               It is not clear whether it is petitioner’s position that               
          none of the $170,000 settlement is includible in her gross income           
          or that only the $84,500 contingency fee paid to Mr. Ober, her              
          attorney, is not includible in her gross income.  On brief,                 
          petitioner argues:                                                          
               Petitioner clearly did not gain anything from these                    
               funds; they were simply paid to the attorney, Mr. Ober,                

               4Respondent also determined in the notice that petitioner is           
          liable for 1994 for the addition to tax under sec. 6651(a)(2).              
          See supra note 2.                                                           
               5Petitioner makes no argument under sec. 7491(a) or (c).               
          Respondent’s records show that on June 29, 1998, a substitute for           
          return was posted to the account that respondent maintained with            
          respect to petitioner for her taxable year 1994.  We find that              
          respondent’s examination of petitioner’s taxable year 1994 began            
          before July 23, 1998, and that sec. 7491 is not applicable in the           
          instant case.  See Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and               
          Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3001(c), 112 Stat. 727.           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011