Deborah A. Messina - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
               THROUGH HER.  The check for these funds was issued                     
               jointly to Petitioner AND Mr. Ober; Petitioner did not                 
               have exclusive control of these funds at any time.                     
               Further, Petitioner relied upon reasonable sources                     
               including the Attorney General’s Office and the Comp-                  
               troller, both of the State of Maryland, and followed                   
               their instructions regarding how to “pass through”                     
               these funds to Mr. Ober and not be responsible for                     
               taxes on the non-income (reference Exhibit 6-P).  For                  
               all the above reasons, these funds cannot be considered                
               as income and must be excluded from inclusion in the                   
               Petitioner’s Gross Income figure for 1994.  * * *                      
               [Reproduced literally.]                                                
               On the record before us, we find that petitioner has failed            
          to carry her burden of showing that the $170,000 settlement was             
          paid jointly to petitioner and Mr. Ober.6  In any event, the                

               6On the record before us, we further find that petitioner              
          has failed to carry her burden of showing that Exhibit 6-P to               
          which petitioner refers on brief and which is part of the record            
          in this case contained “instructions regarding how to ‘pass                 
          through’ these funds to Mr. Ober and not be responsible for taxes           
          on the non-income”.  The exhibit in question is the Maryland                
          Attorney General’s April 26, 1994 letter to Mr. Ober.  That                 
          letter stated in pertinent part:                                            
                    This is to confirm our conversation of 4/26/94                    
               regarding your proposal to allow Mrs. Messina to claim                 
               a higher number of exemptions on her W-4 Form in order                 
               to substantially reduce the projected withholding of                   
               $60,136.                                                               
                    As we discussed, I spoke to Ellen Coffin of the                   
               [Maryland] Comptroller’s Office who stated that a State                
               employee may claim more exemptions than they actually                  
               have.  The Comptroller’s Office does not make an in-                   
               quiry or judge the number of exemptions but does as a                  
               matter of policy, forward on a quarterly basis, copies                 
               of all W-4s that reflect over 10 exemptions to the                     
               I.R.S.  Ms. Coffin further stated that the employee is                 
               then subject to an inquiry from the I.R.S. that re-                    
               quests that the employee state the basis for claiming                  
               these exemptions on their W-4.                                         
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011