Austin L. Mitchell and Rebecca A. Mitchell - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          for profit, no deduction attributable to such activity shall be             
          allowed under this chapter except as provided in this section.”             
          Deductions that would be allowable without regard to whether the            
          activity is engaged in for profit shall be allowed under section            
          183(b)(1), and deductions that would be allowable only if the               
          activity is engaged in for profit shall be allowed under section            
          183(b)(2), but only to the extent that the gross income from the            
          activity exceeds the deductions allowable under section                     
          183(b)(1).                                                                  
               We begin with the burden of proof.  In general, the                    
          Commissioner’s determinations in the deficiency notice are                  
          presumed correct, and the taxpayer bears the burden of proving              
          that the Commissioner’s determinations are in error.  Rule                  
          142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).  Petitioner           
          did not assert that the burden shifted to respondent under                  
          section 7491.  We therefore treat petitioner as having conceded             
          this issue and find that the burden remains with petitioner.                
               We follow the Court of Appeals opinion squarely on point               
          when appeal from our decision would lie to that court absent                
          stipulation by the parties to the contrary.  Golsen v.                      
          Commissioner, 54 T.C. 742 (1970), affd. 445 F.2d 985 (10th Cir.             
          1971).  A taxpayer residing in the Eighth Circuit, such as                  
          petitioner, must prove he or she conducted the activity with an             
          actual and honest objective of making a profit.  See Evans v.               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011