Nield and Linda Montgomery - Page 24

                                       - 24 -                                         
          of the 6-month period which would give rise to a lawsuit under              
          section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.                                          
               It is well settled that it is the acquisition (grant) of a             
          stock option (as opposed to the exercise of a stock option) that            
          is deemed to be a purchase of a security for purposes of the 6-             
          month short-swing profit recovery provision under section 16(b)             
          of the Exchange Act.10  See Magma Power Co. v. Dow Chem. Co.,               
          supra at 321-322.  The SEC made this point indelibly clear when             
          it adopted the regulatory framework governing insider                       
          transactions involving derivative securities in 1991.  The SEC              
          stated in pertinent part:                                                   
               The functional equivalence of derivative securities and                
               their underlying equity securities for section 16                      
               purposes requires that the acquisition of the                          
               derivative security be deemed the significant event,                   
               not the exercise. * * * The Rules correspondingly                      
               recognize that, for purposes of the abuses addressed by                
               section 16, the exercise of a derivative security, much                
               like the conversion of a convertible security,                         
               essentially changes the form of beneficial ownership                   
               from indirect to direct. Since the exercise represents                 
               neither the acquisition nor the disposition of a right                 

               10  For the sake of completeness, we observe the exercise of           
          a stock option is treated as a purchase of the underlying                   
          security for purposes of the insider reporting provisions under             
          section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.  SEC rule 16a-1(b), 17 C.F.R.            
          sec. 240.16a-1(b) (2006) defines a “call equivalent position” as            
          “a derivative security position that increases in value as the              
          value of the underlying equity increases, including, but not                
          limited to, a long convertible security, a long call option, and            
          a short put option position.”  SEC rule 16a-4(b), 17 C.F.R. sec.            
          240.16a-4(b) (2006), provides that the exercise of a call                   
          equivalent position shall be reported on Form 4 and treated for             
          reporting purposes as (1) a purchase of the underlying security             
          and (2) a closing of the derivative security position.                      





Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011