Nield and Linda Montgomery - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         
               invest (e.g., an issuer stock fund, a bond fund, or a                  
               money market fund).  Plan participants typically are                   
               given the opportunity to engage in ‘fund-switching’                    
               transactions, permitting the transfer of assets from                   
               one fund to another, at periodic intervals.  Plan                      
               participants also commonly have the right to withdraw                  
               their investments in cash from a fund containing equity                
               securities of the issuer.  Fund-switching transactions                 
               involving an issuer equity securities fund and cash                    
               distributions from these funds may present                             
               opportunities for abuse because the investment decision                
               is similar to that involved in a market transaction.                   
               Moreover, the plan may buy and sell issuer equity                      
               securities in the market in order to effect these                      
               transactions, so that the real party on the other side                 
               of the transaction is not the issuer but instead a                     
               market participant.  [Fn. ref. omitted.]                               
          Ownership Reports and Trading by Officers, Directors and                    
          Principal Security Holders, Exchange Act Release No. 34-37260, 61           
          Fed. Reg. 30376, 30379 (June 14, 1996).                                     
               Although petitioner exercised discretion in granting ISOs to           
          himself, in exercising the ISOs, and in disposing of the                    
          underlying shares, petitioner’s activities were not undertaken              
          under the auspices of an employee benefit plan as contemplated              
          under SEC rule 16b-3, nor did his activities result in an                   
          intrafund transfer or a cash distribution from a plan.                      
          Accordingly, we conclude the discretionary transaction provisions           
          are not relevant to the question whether petitioner was subject             
          to a suit under section 16(b) of the Exchange Act during 2000.              
               The period during which petitioner was subject to liability            
          under section 16(b) of the Exchange Act is directly addressed in            
          SEC rule 16b-3(d)(3) and SEC rule 16(b)-6(a) and (b), 17 C.F.R.             






Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011