- 11 - We now address petitioner’s argument that section 108(f)(1) sets forth a general rule that is “not exhaustive of all situation[s] to which [section] 108(f) can apply.” As petitioner correctly points out, section 108(f)(1) sets forth a general rule that excludes from gross income any income from the discharge of a student loan, but that general rule applies only if the requirements of that section are satisfied. Only Congress may provide exceptions to the general rule that it prescribed in section 108(f)(1). Congress did so in section 108(f)(3) entitled “Exception For Discharges On Account Of Services Performed For Certain Lenders.” Section 108(f)(3) precludes the application of the general rule of section 108(f)(1) (i.e., precludes the exclusion from gross income of any income from the discharge of a student loan that otherwise meets the requirements of section 108(f)(1)) if such discharge of a student loan made by an organization described in section 108(f)(2)(D) was on account of services performed for such organization. We turn finally to petitioner’s argument that the Court should be guided by not only the letter but also the spirit of section 108(f)(1). The Court must follow the law as written by 5(...continued) discharged if the individual worked for a certain period of time in certain professions for any of a broad class of employers.” Sec. 108(f)(1). The term “certain professions” to which sec. 108(f)(1) applies are medicine, nursing, and teaching. Porten v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-73 n.1 (citing Staff of Joint Comm. on Taxation, General Explanation of the Revenue Provisions of The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 at 1999(J. Comm. Print 1984)).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011