Russell Clifford Mullen and Joan Marie Mullen - Page 8

                                         -7-                                          
          contributions, we must presume that no employee contributions               
          were used to provide petitioner’s disability annuity payments.              
          Sec. 1.72-15(c)(2), Income Tax Regs.                                        
               Furthermore, we conclude that with 10 years of service,                
          petitioner was not eligible for retirement until she turned 62 on           
          November 10, 2003, and that the railroad retirement benefits she            
          received in 2001 were on account of a disability and are                    
          includable in gross income.                                                 
               In sum, petitioner’s disability annuity payments are not               
          subject to the return of capital provisions of section 72(b) (or            
          section 72(d)) and are fully taxable.  See secs. 61(a)(9), (11),            
          72(a).  Respondent’s determination on this issue is sustained.              
          2.   Interest Payments                                                      
               Section 61(a)(4) provides that interest payments are to be             
          included in gross income.  Petitioners stipulated that they                 
          received $241 in interest from the Internal Revenue Service and             
          $4 in interest from Provident Bank.  Petitioners failed to                  
          address in their petition the reason they did not include either            
          interest payment in their 2001 income.  We find, therefore, that            














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011