- 15 - Petitioner offered no evidence showing that respondent’s determination was erroneous.5 We conclude that petitioner’s deficiency for 1985 is the amount that respondent determined. D. Whether Petitioner Is Liable for the Addition to Tax for Fraud 1. Background Respondent contends that petitioner is liable for the addition to tax for fraud under section 6653(b) for 1985.6 Fraud is actual, intentional wrongdoing designed to evade a tax believed to be owing. Webb v. Commissioner, 394 F.2d 366, 377 (5th Cir. 1968), affg. T.C. Memo. 1966-81. To prevail under section 6653(b)(1), the Commissioner must prove by clear and convincing evidence: (1) Petitioner underpaid tax for 1985, and (2) some part of the underpayment is due to fraud. Secs. 6653(b), 7454(a); Rule 142(b); Parks v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 654, 660-661 (1990); Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 699 (1989). The fact that petitioner failed to meet his burden of proof on the underlying deficiency in this case does not relieve respondent of the burden to prove, by clear and convincing 5 Petitioner made no argument about respondent’s determination. At trial and in his posttrial briefs, he argued only that respondent had unclean hands and that the Government had lost or destroyed exculpatory evidence. 6 For 1985, the addition to tax for fraud consists of 50 percent of the underpayment amount, sec. 6653(b)(1), plus 50 percent of the interest due on the portion of the underpayment attributable to fraud, sec. 6653(b)(2).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011