Brian F. Nicely - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          petitioner indicated that such one-way mileage is 245 miles.7  We           
          are unwilling to rely on document one, document two, or document            
          three.  Petitioner admitted at trial that he has no other docu-             
          ments or records establishing (1) that during 2002 he worked at             
          each of the different job site locations at which he claims he              
          worked for the period of time during that year that he claims he            
          spent at each such location and (2) that during 2002 he drove the           
          respective round-trip mileages that he claims he drove from his             
          home in Ridgeley to such locations.                                         
               On the record before us, we find that petitioner has failed            
          to carry his burden of showing the amount of each business use of           
          his automobile based on mileage and the time of each such use               
          (i.e., the date of each such use).8  On that record, we further             

               7We note that in document three petitioner indicated that he           
          did not stay overnight in Elk Garden, W.Va., at which he claims             
          he worked during 2002.  Nor did petitioner stay overnight in                
          Wiley Ford, W.Va., a job site location listed on document one at            
          which petitioner claims he worked during 2002 and which is,                 
          according to document one, only five miles from petitioner’s home           
          in Ridgeley.  At least with respect to his claimed job site                 
          locations in Elk Garden, W.Va., and Wiley Ford, W.Va., we find              
          that petitioner has failed to show that any travel expenses that            
          he is claiming as deductions for the use of his automobile and              
          for meals with respect to his purported working at such locations           
          were paid or incurred while petitioner was away from home within            
          the meaning of sec. 162(a)(2).                                              
               8On the record before us, we find that petitioner has failed           
          to carry his burden of establishing the respective round-trip               
          mileages between his home in Ridgeley and the job site locations            
          at which he claims he worked during 2002.  In this regard, we               
          note that petitioner claimed at trial that he calculated the                
          respective round-trip mileages between his home in Ridgeley and             
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011