Orion Contracting Trust, Kevin Peter Carmel, General Manager - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
               the services are performed; it is sufficient if he has                 
               the right to do so. The right to discharge is also an                  
               important factor indicating that the person possessing                 
               that right is an employer. Other factors characteristic                
               of an employer, but not necessarily present in every                   
               case, are the furnishing of tools and the furnishing of                
               a place to work, to the individual who performs the                    
               services. In general, if an individual is subject to                   
               the control or direction of another merely as to the                   
               result to be accomplished by the work and not as to the                
               means and methods for accomplishing the result, he is                  
               an independent contractor. * * *                                       
               In deciding whether a worker is a common law employee or an            
          independent contractor, this Court considers:  (1) The degree of            
          control exercised by the principal; (2) which party invests in              
          the work facilities used by the individual; (3) the opportunity             
          of the individual for profit or loss; (4) whether the principal             
          can discharge the individual; (5) whether the work is part of the           
          principal’s regular business; (6) the permanency of the                     
          relationship; and (7) the relationship that the parties believed            
          that they were creating.  Ewens & Miller. Inc. v. Commissioner,             
          supra at 270; Weber v. Commissioner, supra at 387.  All of the              
          facts and circumstances of each case are considered, and no                 
          single factor is dispositive.  Ewens & Miller. Inc. v.                      
          Commissioner, supra at 270; Weber v. Commissioner, supra at 387.            
               While no single factor is dispositive, the degree of control           
          exercised by the principal over the details of the individual’s             
          work is one of the most important factors in determining whether            
          a common law employment relationship exists.  See, e.g.,                    
          Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. Wells, 538 U.S.              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011