Kimberley A. Parlin - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          respondent’s failure to issue a valid Final Notice, rather than             
          for lack of timely filing of a petition.  See Keeton v.                     
          Commissioner, 74 T.C. 377, 379 (1980) (involving failure to file            
          a timely petition challenging a notice of deficiency under                  
          section 6213(a)).  As discussed below, petitioner has not shown             
          that respondent failed to issue a valid Final Notice.                       
               Petitioner alleges that respondent never sent a copy of the            
          Final Notice directly to Mr. Midgley, as directed on petitioner’s           
          Form 2848.  Petitioner contends that pursuant to Massachusetts              
          law, respondent’s alleged failure to give notice to petitioner’s            
          counsel was “an unfair and deceptive trade practice”.                       
               The Form 2848, as executed by petitioner, did not authorize            
          respondent to mail an original document to Mr. Midgley, nor did             
          it indicate that she had moved to a new address.  Accordingly, it           
          did not change petitioner’s last known address for purposes of              
          section 6015(e)(1)(A)(ii) or otherwise affect the mailing                   
          requirements of that section.  See Houghton v. Commissioner, 48             
          T.C 656, 661 (1967) (similarly construing mailing requirements              
          for notices of deficiency under section 6212).  Respondent’s                
          alleged failure to send a copy of the Final Notice to                       
          petitioner’s attorney did not extend the 90-day filing period.              
          See id.; Allen v. Commissioner, 29 T.C. 113, 117 (1957).                    
               Petitioner acknowledges that she received the Final Notice             
          dated November 29, 2004, but complains vaguely that she did not             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011