Kimberley A. Parlin - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          invalid or alter the 90-day filing period pursuant to section               
          6015(e)(1)(A).                                                              
               Mr. Midgley contends that an IRS employee informed him that            
          he had until March 17, 2005, to petition the Tax Court.                     
          Erroneous legal advice by an IRS employee, however, does not                
          generally bind the Commissioner and does not affect, by estoppel            
          or otherwise, the jurisdictional requirement for a timely filed             
          petition.  See Elgart v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-379 (and             
          cases cited therein).                                                       
               In any event, it was petitioner’s and Mr. Midgley’s                    
          responsibility to file the petition on time.  When petitioner               
          faxed him the partial copy of the Final Notice, Mr. Midgley had             
          79 days left to file a petition in the Tax Court.  Mr. Midgley              
          holds himself out as an experienced attorney who has “filed many            
          applications for innocent spouse relief in the past”.  We do not            
          find convincing or satisfactory Mr. Midgley’s unquestioning                 
          reliance on informal advice provided by an IRS employee as to the           
          critical date for filing the Tax Court petition.  Nor is                    
          petitioner availed by Mr. Midgley’s proffered explanation that he           
          was unable to file the petition on time because of his                      
          “workload”.                                                                 











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011