- 2 - and petitioner’s motion for partial summary judgment.1 Petitioners filed a petition in response to respondent’s Decision Letters Concerning Equivalent Hearing under Section 6320 and/or 6330 of the Internal Revenue Code (Decision Letters).2 The issue for decision is whether the Court lacks jurisdiction under sections 6320 and 6330 with regard to the years in issue. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. At the time they filed the petition, petitioners resided in Loma Linda, California. I. 1995 On July 12, 1999, respondent sent petitioner a notice of deficiency addressed to petitioner at his last known address, P.O. Box 1659, Loma Linda, CA 92354-1659, determining petitioner owed an income tax deficiency of $269,251 and a penalty under section 6662(a) in the amount of $53,850.20 for the 1995 tax year. Petitioner did not respond to the notice of deficiency by petitioning the Tax Court within 90 days from July 12, 1999. On November 2, 2000, respondent filed a Notice of Federal Tax Lien with respect to petitioner concerning the 1995 tax year. 1 When we refer to petitioner in the singular, we are referring to petitioner Felix Prakasam. 2 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011