- 10 - Commissioner, 116 T.C. 263, 270 (2001); Kennedy v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 255, 263 (2001). In discussing whether the decision letters in this case constitute a determination, the parties address Craig v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 252 (2002). We differentiated Craig v. Commissioner, supra, in Orum v. Commissioner, supra at 11-12, a case similar to the instant case, by stating: This case is distinguishable from Craig v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 252 (2002), in which we held that we had jurisdiction under section 6330(d)(1) when the Appeals Office issued a decision letter to the taxpayer. Id. at 259. In Craig, the Commissioner mailed to the taxpayer a notice of intent to levy on February 22, 2001. Id. at 254. On March 17, 2001, the taxpayer timely requested a section 6330 hearing by mailing the Commissioner a letter accompanied by unsigned Forms 12153. Id. at 255. On May 6, 2001, the Commissioner received signed Forms 12153 but granted the taxpayer only an equivalent hearing. Id. at 255- 256. A decision letter was then issued to the taxpayer following the equivalent hearing. Id. at 256. The Court held that “where Appeals issued the decision letter to petitioner in response to his timely request for a Hearing, we conclude that the ‘decision’ reflected in the decision letter issued to petitioner is a ‘determination’ for purposes of section 6330(d)(1).” Id. at 259. In the instant case, as in Orum v. Commissioner, supra, petitioners did not timely request a collection hearing in response to the November 7, 2000, and April 24, 2002, notices. As a result, we do not conclude that the decisions in the decision letters are determinations for purposes of sections 6320(c) and 6330(d)(1). Orum v. Commissioner, supra at 12.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011