Katherine Ilovar Rodriguez - Page 11

                                        - 10 -                                        
               An abuse of discretion is a decision that:  (1) Rests on an            
          error of law or a clearly erroneous factual finding, or (2) a               
          decision not necessarily the product of legal error or a clearly            
          erroneous finding of fact but nevertheless is outside the range             
          of permissible decisions.  Zervos v. Verizon N.Y., Inc., 252 F.3d           
          163, 169 (2d Cir. 2001).                                                    
               Petitioner argued at trial that she was not given a hearing            
          at which she could be heard and have her accountant present.  But           
          petitioner was offered two alternative dates for a hearing and a            
          2-day extension after she failed to appear at the hearing on the            
          second alternative date.  Petitioner failed to request or make an           
          appointment between the 2-day extension and the issuance of the             
          notice of determination.                                                    
               Once a taxpayer has been given an opportunity for a hearing            
          but fails to avail herself of that opportunity, the Appeals                 
          officer may proceed in making a determination by reviewing the              
          case file.  See Mann v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-48; sec.              
          301.6330-1(d)(2), Q&A-D7, Proced. & Admin. Regs.  When petitioner           
          did not appear for the hearing, Ms. Dellosso reviewed                       
          petitioner’s case file and considered the sole issue raised by              
          petitioner in her request for a hearing, that she had “paid the             
          tax”.  After the review, respondent issued the notice of                    
          determination.                                                              
               Petitioner alleges that she offered to pay the tax in full,            
          certainly a viable collection alternative, and the settlement               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011