- 3 - Background2 At the time of filing the petition, petitioner resided in Poway, California. On April 15, 2001, petitioner and his wife (Mrs. Schwersensky)3 jointly submitted a Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 2000 on which they inserted zeros into every line related to income and taxes and attached a two-page statement of frivolous tax protester arguments.4 Petitioner and Mrs. Schwersensky included with the Form 1040 two Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, for 2000, indicating that Qualcomm, Inc. paid petitioner $551,779.60 in wages and withheld Federal income tax of $144,201.31, and that Marantha Chapel paid Mrs. Schwersensky $6,630.00 in wages and withheld $262.50 in Federal income tax. The Form 1040 sought a refund of the couple's combined withholdings of $144,463.81. On May 18, 2001, respondent advised petitioner and Mrs. Schwersensky by letter that the Form 1040 they submitted for 2000 was frivolous and that the position taken 2 The facts hereinafter are established in the record and/or undisputed. 3 Although petitioner's spouse, Maureen T. Schwersensky, requested a sec. 6330 hearing jointly with petitioner and the resulting notice of determination was issued to both, only petitioner filed a petition in this case. 4 These contentions included, inter alia, that "no section of the Internal Revenue Code * * * establishes an income tax 'liability'" and "'income' * * * can only be a derivative of corporate activity."Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011