Dwight Schwersensky - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
          Commissioner, 102 T.C. 596, 614 (1994); Stamos v. Commissioner,             
          95 T.C. 624, 638 (1990), affd. without published opinion 956 F.2d           
          1168 (9th Cir. 1992).                                                       
               In Pierson v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 576, 581 (2000), this             
          Court issued a stern warning to taxpayers concerning the                    
          imposition of a penalty under section 6673(a) on those taxpayers            
          who abused the availability of the protections offered by                   
          sections 6320 and 6330 by instituting actions merely for purposes           
          of delay or by taking frivolous or groundless positions in such             
          actions.  See Kemper v. Commissioner, supra.                                
               Petitioner's essential position in this case is that he owes           
          no Federal income taxes despite having received over a half a               
          million dollars in wages and, according to information returns              
          that have not been legitimately disputed, more than $600,000 in             
          proceeds from securities trading.  Petitioner further invents               
          numerous groundless claims to defeat respondent's collection of             
          duly assessed taxes.  Petitioner's position is patently                     
          frivolous.  His tax protester arguments persuade us that he                 
          invoked the section 6330 protections in bad faith.  Respondent's            
          motion for summary judgment and to impose a penalty put                     
          petitioner on effective warning that section 6673 penalties might           
          be imposed.  Petitioner nonetheless persisted in his course of              
          conduct, as evidenced by the tax protester rhetoric in his                  
          response to respondent's motion.  Petitioner has merely wasted              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011