- 8 -
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Tax Court Rule
90, a written answer to these requests must be filed
with the Tax Court and a copy served on the undersigned
within 30 days after service of these requests for
admission.
Also on August 26, 2005, respondent lodged a response to
petitioner’s requests for admission. As petitioner had filed no
request for admission with this Court, as of that date,5 the
Court ordered petitioner to file a request for admission by
September 26, 2005. However, petitioner failed to file such a
request for admission in compliance with the Court’s order.
Instead, on September 26, 2005, petitioner filed a response to
respondent’s request for admissions. Petitioner admitted that he
was married to Rose Siron throughout 1998, that he resided in
Blythewood, South Carolina, at the time of filing the petition,
that FN Manufacturing paid petitioner compensation of $27,011
during 1998, that the State Board paid petitioner compensation
of $323 during 1998, and that the State Board withheld Federal
income tax of $8. However, with respect to respondent’s requests
5Respondent submitted to the Court a document purporting to
be “Petitioner’s First Request for Admissions” as an exhibit to
respondent’s motion to show cause why proposed facts and evidence
should not be accepted as established. The document was signed
by petitioner and dated Aug. 29, 2005, but was not filed with
this Court by petitioner. The document contained a series of
incoherent and illogical arguments purporting to rely on the 16th
Amendment, the Internal Revenue Code, and Supreme Court
decisions.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011