Wayne Curtis Siron - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          established.6  As noted supra note 1, we granted respondent’s               
          motion and further ordered petitioner to file a response in                 
          compliance with Rule 91(f)(2) or respondent’s proposed                      
          stipulations would be deemed established.  Petitioner failed to             
          file a response.  Consequently, we ordered the facts deemed                 
          stipulated pursuant to Rule 91(f)(3).                                       
               On January 9, 2006, the parties appeared at trial, and                 
          respondent filed a motion for penalty pursuant to section 6673.             
                                   Discussion                                         
               Section 61(a) provides that gross income includes all income           
          from whatever source derived except as otherwise provided.                  
          Specifically, gross income includes compensation for services.              
          Sec. 61(a)(1).  Section 6012(a) generally requires the filing of            
          a tax return by every individual with gross income equal to or              
          exceeding the exemption amount.                                             
               Petitioner contends that he had no taxable income in 1998              
          and, consequently, that he was not required to file an income tax           
          return or pay income tax.  However, petitioner concedes that he             
          received $27,011.27 of compensation from FN Manufacturing and               
          $323 of compensation from the State Board during 1998.                      
          Petitioner has not made any viable contention or offered any                
          evidence as to why that compensation should not be included in              

               6The proposed facts referenced in respondent’s motion to               
          show cause are nearly identical to the revised stipulation of               
          facts.                                                                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011