Hugh D. Summers and Teresa E. Summers - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         
          where the taxpayer is not in compliance with the tax laws.                  
          Collier v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-171; Rodriguez v.                  
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-153.                                          
               The record in the instant case demonstrates that a face-to-            
          face conference would not have been productive.  On May 10, 2002,           
          petitioners, through their attorney who was authorized to                   
          represent them, submitted a request for a section 6330 hearing              
          accompanied by a 37-page letter replete with tax protester                  
          boilerplate.  On April 28, 2005, Ms. Dermody sent petitioners a             
          letter wherein she provided a copy of their request for a section           
          6330 hearing and advising petitioners that, if they wanted a                
          face-to-face hearing they must contact her within 15 days and               
          describe the legitimate issues they wished to raise.  Ms. Dermody           
          also advised petitioners that they must complete a Form 433-A,              
          and return it along with their 2003 and 2004 tax returns by                 
          May 13, 2005.                                                               
               On May 13, 2005, Mr. Summers sent Ms. Dermody a letter in              
          which he raised the following issues:  (1) That Ms. Dermody was a           
          settlement officer, not an independent Appeals officer, and that            
          it was improper for her to hold the hearing; (2) that respondent            
          violated the “CDP statutes” by not holding a section 6330 hearing           
          for more than 3 years from the date of the request; and (3) that            
          petitioners did not have any tax liability for 1989 because the             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011