- 59 -
that payments made by that person after the period of the appeal
were intended to compensate Izen for representation in the
ensuing remand proceedings in this Court. Since most of the
additional Izen contracts we have received relating to those
remand proceedings call for monthly payments beginning March 1,
2003, we shall deem the period of the appeal to have ended
February 28, 2003, for these purposes (rather than the January
17, 2003, issue date of Dixon V). Under that convention, the
three remaining listed payors who are eligible persons made
payments to Izen for appellate services in the aggregate amount
of $4,600.
d. Direct Obligations--Fixed Amounts
The Izen petitioners have submitted (or established the
existence of) individual contracts for appellate legal services
between Izen and 17 nontest case petitioners,41 as well as net
worth affidavits for 16 of those petitioners. All but one of the
contracts require payments of $4,800 (the other calls for
payments of $2,400). Thus, the aggregate fixed payment
obligation of the 16 eligible persons is $74,400 [(15 X $4,800) +
$2,400 = $72,000 + $2,400 = $74,400].
41 Two of those 17 nontest case petitioners apparently did
not make any “payments on appeal”.
Page: Previous 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011