- 5 - JOURNALS DUES”. As required by section 67(a), petitioners reduced those expenses by two percent of their adjusted gross income (i.e., by $1,631). In determining the taxable income reported in their 2001 return, petitioners deducted the balance (i.e., $3,161), as well as the other itemized deductions claimed in the 2001 Schedule A that were not subject to the two-percent floor imposed by section 67(a). In the 2002 Schedule A, petitioners claimed $2,300 of unreimbursed employee expenses, which they identified in that schedule as “EXPENSES”. As required by section 67(a), petition- ers reduced those expenses by two percent of their adjusted gross income (i.e., by $1,488). In determining the taxable income reported in their 2002 return, petitioners deducted the balance (i.e., $812), as well as the other itemized deductions claimed in the 2002 Schedule A that were not subject to the two-percent floor imposed by section 67(a). In the 2003 Schedule A, petitioners claimed $2,300 of unreimbursed employee expenses, which they identified in that schedule as “UNION DUES ACCOUNTING JOU”. As required by section 67(a), petitioners reduced those expenses by two percent of their adjusted gross income (i.e., by $1,716). In determining the taxable income reported in their 2002 return, petitioners de- ducted the balance (i.e., $584), as well as the other itemized deductions claimed in the 2003 Schedule A that were not subjectPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007