Benjamin O. & Linda L. Agbaniyaka - Page 17




                                       - 17 -                                         
          respect to that claimed business was for profit.  On that record,           
          we find that petitioners have failed to carry their burden of               
          establishing that during each of the years at issue Mr.                     
          Agbaniyaka was carrying on an arts and crafts business within the           
          meaning of section 162(a).                                                  
               Based upon our examination of the entire record before us,             
          we find that petitioners have failed to carry their burden of               
          establishing that they are entitled for each of their taxable               
          years 2001 through 2004 to the Schedule C net loss that they                
          claim for each such year.14                                                 

               14Assuming arguendo that petitioners had carried their                 
          burden of establishing that during each of the years at issue Mr.           
          Agbaniyaka was carrying on an arts and crafts business, they                
          would still have to satisfy other applicable requirements in                
          order to carry their burden of establishing their entitlement to            
          the Schedule C net loss claimed for each such year.  With respect           
          to the cost of goods sold that petitioners claim for each of                
          their taxable years 2002 through 2004, on the record before us,             
          we find that petitioners have failed to carry their burden of               
          establishing the manner by which they derived the cost of goods             
          sold claimed, the propriety of that manner, and the propriety of            
          the amount that they claim.  With respect to the depreciation               
          deduction that petitioners claim for the Dodge van for each of              
          their taxable years 2001 through 2004, on the record before us,             
          we find that petitioners have failed to carry their burden of               
          establishing the propriety of the depreciation deduction claimed            
          for each such year.  See, e.g., sec. 167(c) (Basis for Deprecia-            
          tion).  With respect to the expenses that petitioners claim for             
          each of their taxable years 2001 through 2004 relating to the               
          Dodge van (e.g., gasoline, repair, oil), which is listed property           
          within the meaning of sec. 280F(d)(4)(A)(i), on the record before           
          us, we find that petitioners have failed to carry their burden,             
          inter alia, of establishing all of the elements that they must              
          prove in order to satisfy the requirements under sec. 274(d).               
          See sec. 274(d)(4); sec. 1.274-5T(b)(6), Temporary Income Tax               
          Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46016 (Nov. 6, 1985).  With respect to the              
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007