- 33 - D. Conclusion Petitioners have not shown that respondent’s determination was arbitrary or capricious, or without sound basis in fact or law. For all of the above reasons, we hold that respondent’s determination was not an abuse of discretion, and respondent may proceed with the proposed collection action as determined in the notice of determination. In reaching our holdings herein, we have considered all arguments made, and, to the extent not mentioned above, we find them to be moot, irrelevant, or without merit. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Last modified: May 25, 2011