- 3 - 837 (9th Cir. 2001); Starvest U.S., Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-314. Respondent’s motion asserts that the case must be dismissed because it “was not brought by a party with the capacity to engage in litigation in this Court.” Respondent’s motion notes that, pursuant to Rule 60(c), the capacity of a corporation to engage in litigation in this Court is determined in accordance with the law of the State in which the corporation was organized. According to respondent’s motion, under Florida law, “only a licensed attorney may represent a corporation in court.” Respondent’s motion points out that Mr. Asbury was not a licensed attorney when he filed the instant petition and, thus, he “lacked the capacity to file such action pursuant to T.C. Rule 60.” In a supplement to petitioner’s notice of objection, Mr. Asbury asserts, on petitioner’s behalf, that petitioner was incorporated in the State of Florida in 1986 and was administratively dissolved in 2002 for failure to file its corporate annual report and to pay the necessary fees to renew its corporate charter. According to Mr. Asbury, during petitioner’s existence, he was its “only officer (president, secretary and treasurer)” and he signed all corporate documents in that capacity. Mr. Asbury citesPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011