Lloyd T. Asbury, Attorney at Law, P.A. - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
             Rule 60(c) and asserts that under Florida law, an                        
             administratively dissolved corporation is not precluded                  
             from bringing an action in its corporate name.  He claims                
             authority to represent petitioner, pursuant to Rule 24(b),               
             as petitioner’s only corporate officer.                                  
                  Respondent’s reply to the supplement to petitioner’s                
             notice of objection does not deny any of the facts alleged               
             by petitioner.  Respondent’s reply also makes it plain that              
             it is not petitioner’s status as an administratively                     
             dissolved Florida corporation that is the basis for                      
             respondent’s position that the instant petition must be                  
             dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.  Respondent concedes                 
             that “petitioner is entitled to bring this action” on the                
             basis of Fla. Stat. Ann. secs. 607.1405 and 607.1421 (West               
             2001).  Those provisions of the Florida Statutes, according              
             to respondent, “allow administratively dissolved                         
             corporations to carry on or defend an action in their                    
             corporate name.”                                                         
                  Respondent’s position is that petitioner, as                        
             represented by Mr. Asbury, did not have the capacity to                  
             file the instant petition because Mr. Asbury was not                     
             authorized under Florida law to file the instant petition                
             on petitioner’s behalf.  Respondent argues that, under Rule              
             60(c), the capacity of a representative to litigate in this              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011