Debra Anne Banderas - Page 29




                                       - 29 -                                         
               Hence, petitioner’s compliance with tax laws subsequent to             
          the filing of the 1999 return reveals shortcomings.                         
          Additionally, petitioner’s generalized allusions to financial               
          pressures and information misplaced during moves are insufficient           
          to establish good faith efforts with respect to the series of               
          delinquencies occurring over a period of years.  This factor                
          weighs against relief.                                                      
               The presence of abuse is a factor weighing in favor of                 
          relief, but its absence carries no contrary weight.  Rev. Proc.             
          2003-61, sec. 4.03(2)(b)(i), 2003-2 C.B. at 299.  Because                   
          petitioner has at no point alleged any abuse by Dr. Banderas,               
          this factor is neutral.                                                     
               The final factor enumerated in the revenue procedure, and              
          again weighing only in favor of and not against relief, is                  
          directed toward whether the requesting spouse was in poor mental            
          or physical health when signing the return or seeking relief.               
          Id. sec. 4.03(2)(b)(ii), 2003-2 C.B. at 299.  The nature, extent,           
          and duration of illness are to be taken into account.  Id.                  
          Petitioner’s statements at trial and on brief incorporate general           
          assertions of high blood pressure, depression, and bad knees.               
          Nonetheless, the record is bereft of any corroborating medical              
          documentation or any specific contentions regarding how such                
          ailments might have impacted petitioner’s ability to meet her               
          Federal tax obligations.  In fact, petitioner acknowledged that,            







Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007